Dividends vs Growth Stocks: Which Is Right for You?

The Company That Refuses to Pay a Dividend (And Why That’s the Point)

This week we profiled Berkshire Hathaway — the holding company that Greg Abel now runs after Warren Buffett’s six-decade reign as CEO. BRK.B does not pay a dividend. It never has. And under Abel, the policy remains firmly in place.

That’s not an oversight. It’s a philosophy.

Buffett’s argument has always been: if the company can reinvest every dollar of earnings at a higher rate of return than shareholders could achieve after paying tax on a distribution, then handing the money back would destroy value. For most of Berkshire’s history, that argument held. A dollar retained inside Berkshire compounded into far more than a dollar distributed, taxed, and reinvested by the average shareholder.

Berkshire is a growth stock that doesn’t look like one. And it’s the perfect introduction to one of the most fundamental questions in investing: dividends or growth?

The answer, like most good investing answers, is: it depends on you.

What Are Dividends, Exactly?

A dividend is a cash payment a company makes to its shareholders, typically quarterly. It is a portion of profits distributed directly to owners rather than retained and reinvested in the business.

Companies that pay meaningful dividends tend to be mature, stable businesses with predictable cash flows — utilities, consumer staples, major banks, and healthcare giants. They have already built most of their infrastructure. Rather than reinvesting every dollar into growth (which often requires heavy capital spending), they return excess cash to the people who own the company.

In Australia, dividends from ASX-listed companies often come with an important bonus: franking credits. These offset the tax already paid at the company level so shareholders are not fully taxed twice on the same profits. Australia’s imputation system is among the most investor-friendly in the world, particularly because unused credits are often refundable for lower-tax or zero-tax investors. This makes Australian dividend stocks especially attractive for domestic investors, particularly those in superannuation pension phase.

The Case for Dividend Investing

1. Regular income — without selling anything
Dividends land in your account like clockwork. For retirees, near-retirees, or anyone who needs investments to generate cash flow, they provide an income stream without forcing you to sell shares or time the market.

2. Compounding through reinvestment
The real power of dividends often lies in reinvesting them. Most brokerages and platforms offer Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRPs) that automatically buy more shares with each payout. Over time, the share count grows, future dividends increase, and the compounding effect accelerates.

3. Emotional ballast
Markets are volatile. Share prices rise and fall. Consistent dividend income makes a 15% price drop easier to sit through — you are being paid to wait. That psychological benefit is real and helps many investors avoid panic-selling at the wrong moment.

4. Signal of business quality
A company that raises its dividend every year for decades is rarely doing so by accident. It usually reflects reliable cash generation, disciplined capital allocation, and genuine alignment with shareholders. Johnson & Johnson, which we covered last week, is a textbook example: it has now increased its dividend for 64 consecutive years.

5. The Aussie franking advantage
For Australian residents holding ASX-listed shares, fully franked dividends deliver a tax offset for the corporate tax already paid (usually 30%). Investors in lower tax brackets — including many retirees in pension phase — can receive a cash refund of unused franking credits. This is a structural edge that makes domestic dividend investing particularly compelling inside super.

A quick caution: high yields can sometimes signal trouble rather than opportunity (“dividend traps”). Always look at the sustainability of the payout and the underlying business, not just the current yield.

The Case for Growth Stock Investing

1. Compounding without the annual tax drag
Every dollar paid as a dividend is a dollar that triggers tax in the year it is received. A growth company that retains earnings and reinvests them successfully delays that tax event until you sell. Capital can therefore compound for years or decades without an annual tax leakage. The longer the runway, the more powerful this becomes.

Simple illustration:
Imagine a company earns $1 of after-tax profit.

• If it pays the $1 as a fully franked dividend to an investor on a 30% marginal rate (with franking), the investor keeps most of it after tax offsets.
• If instead the company retains and reinvests that $1 at a high return (say 12–15% compounded), the same capital can grow substantially larger over 15–20 years before any personal tax is paid. The difference compounds meaningfully over long periods, especially when the alternative is paying tax and reinvesting the reduced after-tax amount yourself.

2. Bigger upside potential
A mature dividend payer growing earnings at 5% per year and a high-quality growth company expanding at 15–25% are structurally different bets. Early-stage compounders (think Amazon in its growth phase, or Nvidia before it became a household name) can deliver returns that traditional dividend stocks simply cannot match. The trade-off is higher volatility and the risk that the growth story slows or disappoints.

3. Flexibility on your own terms
Growth investors often talk about “creating your own dividend” by selling a small number of shares when cash is needed. You choose the timing and amount, which gives greater control over when capital gains tax is realised — especially useful given Australia’s 50% CGT discount for assets held longer than 12 months in personal names (or the concessional rates inside super).

4. International exposure and tax efficiency for US stocks
Most major growth companies are US-listed. Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Apple and Meta pay dividends, but the yields are typically low (often under 1%). The bulk of historical returns has come from capital appreciation. For Australians investing in US markets there are no franking credits, and dividends attract 15% US withholding tax plus Australian tax. In many cases the lower-yield, higher-appreciation model is more tax-efficient over long holding periods.

Note that many quality companies also return capital via share buybacks (Berkshire’s preferred method when the stock trades below intrinsic value). Buybacks can be more tax-efficient than dividends for remaining shareholders.

The Australian Tax Angle

This is where theory becomes practical for local investors.

ASX-listed dividend stocks: Fully franked dividends are highly tax-efficient, especially inside super. In accumulation phase the fund’s tax rate is 15%; in pension phase earnings are generally tax-free (exempt current pension income). Excess franking credits can generate cash refunds. This is one reason Australian dividend investing has such a strong following among SMSF trustees and retirees.

US-listed growth stocks: Dividends face 15% US withholding tax under the tax treaty, then form part of Australian assessable income. Capital gains on shares held more than 12 months attract the 50% CGT discount in personal names, or an effective 10% rate inside accumulation-phase super (and 0% in pension phase). For long-term US growth investing, the math frequently favours capital appreciation over dividend income.

Rule of thumb:

• Investing in Australian stocks primarily for income and tax efficiency → dividend stocks (especially fully franked names) shine, particularly inside super.
• Investing in US growth markets for long-term wealth building → lean toward growth, hold for at least 12 months, and let capital appreciation do the heavy lifting.

A Framework: Match the Strategy to Your Life Stage

Neither approach is universally superior. The right mix depends on where you are in your investing journey.

The WSDU Verdict

The dividends-versus-growth debate is often framed as a choice between income and growth. It is more accurately a choice about when you want to realise returns and how the tax system treats them.

Berkshire Hathaway — the business we profiled this week — is the extreme expression of the growth argument: zero dividends, maximum reinvestment, and six decades of compounding. It is also a reminder that the absence of a dividend is not the absence of a return. It is a return being reinvested on your behalf by managers who (hopefully) can compound capital better than you can after tax.

Most Australian investors are not building a personal Berkshire. They need income at some point. They hold super accounts that move between different tax rates. They balance US growth exposure against domestic ASX holdings.

The smartest approach for most people is deliberate blending:

• Dividend stocks (especially fully franked ASX names) for income, franking benefits, and emotional durability.
• Growth stocks for long-term capital compounding — particularly in US markets where franking does not apply anyway.

The only wrong answer is choosing one side by default and refusing to adjust as your financial life and tax situation change.

Data Sources:

• Berkshire Hathaway 2025 Annual Report / Greg Abel’s first shareholder letter (February 2026) — dividend and capital allocation policy
• Johnson & Johnson official announcement, April 2026 — 64th consecutive annual dividend increase
• Australian Taxation Office guidance on franking credits, SMSF taxation, and exempt current pension income.
• US–Australia tax treaty provisions on dividend withholding (15% rate)
• Public company filings and historical dividend records (Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson & Johnson)

Wall St. Down Under | Australia

Subscribe | wallstdownunder.com.au

Disclaimer: Wall St. Down Under is an independent financial newsletter for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing published here constitutes financial advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any investment decision. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions. Australian investors should consider their own financial situation, objectives, and risk tolerance. Past performance is not indicative of future results.